Contemporary Classical Music: The Emperor’s New Music? (Part 2)

All about good music, bad music and why we don’t get those nice melodies any more…….

And now to continue my story……..

What do Abba and Mr Beethoven have in common?

Beethoven concerts will always “put bums on seats”.
Conversely contemporary classical music invariably keeps bums off them. Surely that tells us something?
There is probably an element of reputation in Beethoven’s popularity but then how did he get that reputation? Other composers of his time composed huge numbers of works but are not as popular. For example Haydn (also a superb composer) composed 104 symphonies; Beethoven composed 9. Guess who is more popular? I put it down to Beethoven’s strong melodic lines; music that makes you want to dance and sing; music that you can whistle in the shower.
Beethoven is of course not the only popular composer from that period. Mozart has also provided us with innumerable beautiful melodic lines and has huge and continuing popular support. And this is over 200 years after he died! (It is worth noting too that all these early composers wrote some forgettable music; it is seldom played.)
I return to one of my opening questions: why have there been no composers approaching their stature in the last 100 years? Surely they didn’t use up all the nice melodies?

Fast forward to rock ‘n roll

Skip forward 150 years from Beethoven’s heyday to the start of popular music as we know it today. Arguably it started with Bill Haley, then Elvis. The Coasters. The Platters. The Beatles. The Rolling Stones….the list is interminable and everyone has their favourites.
These early rock bands/groups had that extra special “something”, principally strong rhythms and melodic lines that still keeps them popular 50 years after they recorded. How many Elvis impersonators in your town? Want to get everyone dancing at a party? Put on The Beatles. Or Abba, arguably one of the most melodic groups of all time and still hugely popular. But not just The Beatles and Abba. Many other bands and groups from the mid-50’s to the late 70’s will just as quickly get everyone up and dancing at any party. What is the common denominator? Strong melodic lines – just like Beethoven! (There is a notable postscript to this. One of the most popular musicals of recent times is Mama Mia which is all Abba. Strong melodic lines win again.)
Popular music seems to be going the same way as classical, in that the melodic lines that used to stick in our minds do not seem to be happening anymore. Perhaps this is why the music of 30, 40, 50 years ago is still so popular. But at this point I will exit the discussion about popular music because that is a whole new subject. Maybe someone out there would like to kick it off? (Don’t forget to include jazz and musicals which have strong parallels.)

Musical “fashion”

Some would have us believe that certain styles of music are no longer “fashionable”. Unfortunately fashion has always played a major role in contemporary composition, even in Beethoven’s time, but I suggest that fashions are not dictated by the public. Conversely popular public taste is often referred to derisively as “populist”, not fashionable.
Historically critics and other music professionals have been at the forefront of fashion with documented examples of rejection at best and scathing criticism at worst, of “unfashionable” music. Unfortunately there seems to be fewer recorded examples of the public reaction to those pieces, but subsequent history has clearly shown wide public support for those works.
There are of course exemptions, and Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring ballet score is the most notable of those. Briefly, the first performance in 1913 in Paris resulted in public riots in protest at the music.
We are told that it can take time for new musical styles to become popular and that even Beethoven stretched the boundaries of what was publicly acceptable – but when that guy died 20,000 mourners lined the streets for his funeral. Today that would be equivalent to half a million on the streets of New York. It didn’t take long for Beethoven to get the public on his side!
Whoever or whatever is dictating the current “fashion” in contemporary classical composition, the public are just not buying into it. The public do not want atonal. They don’t want experimentation for the sake of it. Music is not an intellectual exercise. The poor old public much prefer the simple melodies and harmonies which are largely ignored by contemporary composers. This is why the public stick with all the old favourites; they provide something the public can just be able to “sit back and enjoy”.
Faced with 150-year-old music and traditions, or bewildering cacophonous contemporary music, it is no wonder that classical music is regarded as “elite” by so many.
How has this come about? Could it be that the professionals enjoy atonal, experimental music because their musical tastes are more highly developed than those of the public and hence their preference for intellectual music? Thus composition graduates will conform to those preferences, and the cycle continues.
We do not need fashion in classical music and in fact fashion could be said to be the western equivalent of Shostakovich’s Soviet repression. We – the consumer, the customer, the audience – pay the piper. We should also call the tune!

Have I been a bit harsh?

To those who feel compelled to strongly protest I repeat my personal concerns:
1. Most regular attendees of classical concerts view new compositions with apprehension.
2. In general only classical music more than 100 years old is universally popular with paying audiences.
3. There has not been a single classical composer with the universal stature of the 18th and 19th century greats, in the last 100 years.
4. Most new classical music has few or no memorable melody lines.
If you still think I’m off beam maybe you would like to point out where I’m wrong!

Some thoughts to ponder

Somewhere, somehow, the world of contemporary composition has headed down a very narrow path and has lost sight of its supporters, the public at large. However I would like to end on a positive note.
1. Ignore experts. One of the few real freedoms we have left is to choose whether to like or dislike. If you like a piece of music, don’t be talked out of it – even by me. Enjoy it, support it and feel the freedom! I have had many people say to me that they “know little about music but rather enjoyed a piece of music.” My invariable response is that they don’t need to know anything about music. It is enough that they enjoyed it.
2. Be adventurous. Try a new musical genre. Try a new composer. Try a new band. The worst that can happen is that you have wasted the price of a ticket. The best that can happen is that a whole new world opens up to you, as it has for me in the last 15 years.
3. Don’t create fashions! Producing hordes of latter-day Beethoven or McCartney clones would again make us slaves to music fashion. Total freedom in music must be encouraged. If you want to compose saccharine ballads, go for it! If you want to compose a concerto for tuba and side drum, go for it! Our budding composers should be actively encouraged to do what they want to do, but to do it well. To be able to compose Country and Western so sad even your dog will start crying. Or try to take over Mozart’s mantle if you’re brave (or silly) enough. The public will soon let you know if you get it right.
4. Contemporary music isn’t all bad. I clearly recall the first visit to New Zealand of the Eroica Trio, an extremely talented piano trio from USA. As part of their concert they performed a new piece by a local college girl and it was very enjoyable. Lovely harmonies, a beautifully structured piece that was pleasant to listen to. Our applause for that piece was genuine affirmation.
I recently attended a composers’ workshop and had several days of wall-to-wall contemporary classical music. Some of it was outside my comfort zone but some of it I genuinely enjoyed.
5. WE MUST STILL SUPPORT NEW COMPOSERS AND EXPERIMENTATION. I do not advocate banning experimental music. I just want to encourage more classical composers (and writers of popular music) to provide for those of us with traditional, simple, tastes in music.
The ones that get it right will get a rewarding career. The ones that get it wrong may need to revise their ambitions, and I include myself in that category.
6. Most importantly. History has shown us that the public are the best judges of music that will endure. Composers who want to bring enjoyment to a wide audience should let only the public and history be the judge of their success.
As a budding composer, have I put my money where my mouth is? Judge for yourself with clips of my first composition. They may not be Mozart (I wish!) but the melodic lines are strong.
I hope I haven’t lost you with my ramblings. However I started by asking if all the nice tunes been used up. My response is: NO! There are innumerable melodies still to be written. They must be written. There is a huge audience just waiting for those nice, simple melodies that they can sing to themselves, and they can relate to. Composers and songwriters: rediscover your roots!

Published in: on November 22, 2009 at 4:33 pm  Comments (4)  
Tags: ,

Contemporary Classical Music: The Emperor’s New Music?

All about good music, bad music and why we don’t get those nice melodies any more…….

Music lovers and bloggers I have a question: have all the nice tunes been used up?

Andrew_portrait approved 24 July 09The world’s population has more than doubled since the era of the Beatles – have there been any rock composers since then to match the output and enduring popularity of Lennon and McCartney?

The world’s population has increased seven-fold since 1800 so why has it been 100 years since we had a classical composer who even approached the stature of Bach or Mozart or Beethoven or Verdi or Puccini?  (Shostakovich is the only one born in the 20th century that I can think of.)

Are we living in a melodic desert?  Or are we unwittingly subscribing to the musical equivalent of The Emperor’s New Clothes?

The Emperor’s New Music:  Acoustic or electronic noise with no melodic or harmonic merit but which is publicly applauded by persons who would never voluntarily listen to it in the privacy of their own homes.  It is optimistically called “music” by some.  The compositions are most frequently contemporary although they can be found throughout the history of music.  In nightclubs the music is sometimes made more endurable by ingesting, inhaling or injecting illegal substances.  (Source: Andrewpedia……)

For most of us music is a large part of our lives but those of us who enjoy tuneful melodies are being short-changed by contemporary composers and songwriters.  We want to get back to our musical roots, melodies that make us happy, melodies we can whistle or sing.  But nobody seems to want to compose for us.  Do you agree?  If so then please support me!

To start let’s dispense with the caveats, and if you want to check out my bio you can visit my web site.

Caveats (aka covering your butt)

Musical taste is subjective.  The noises that offend one set of ears will be pure pleasure to another – and vice versa.  This is one of the really exciting qualities of music!  I have no desire to convert anyone to my tastes; to do so would completely contradict what this blog is all about.  Read on.

The second caveat is that my argument is full of sweeping generalities.  Hopefully the general drift of my argument comes through and nit-picking will be minimal.

My comments are based on my New Zealand experiences but they will apply to many other countries.

Although my musical preference is now for classical, I still enjoy popular music and my comments apply to both genres – as well as musicals and jazz, which I also enjoy.

Good music / Bad music

Music is usually described as being “good” (nice to listen to) or “bad” (unpleasant or boring to listen to) but I prefer to define “good” music as any music that any person enjoys for any of the following reasons:

  • Would you like to hear that music again?
  • Did that music trigger a reaction – did you want to dance, sing, laugh, cry or just stay very quiet and listen?

Of course the converse applies for the definition of “bad” music.

(By this definition there is probably no such thing as bad music because someone, somewhere, will enjoy listening to it!)

However for me and my friends, and I suspect many others, “bad” music in the classical genre usually consists of contemporary atonal, often experimental, music.  It is often (euphemistically) referred to as being “less accessible”.  Sure, there are people out there who like it, but they are either very few or they don’t go to concerts.

In the realm of popular music, “bad” music for me consists of tuneless noise with no soul.  Most of it is contemporary.

This is not to say all contemporary music is “bad” and all old music is “good”.

Also good lyrics cannot rescue bad music.  Good lyrics equal good poetry.

Not very technical but hopefully you see where I’m coming from.

Who am I to comment?

Let me establish my credentials.  In my younger days I only listened to popular music (which incidentally met my criteria for “good” music), and was even lucky enough to see The Beatles live.  Now my preference is classical.  My partner and I attend a concert, recital or “other musical event” once a week on average, and subscribe to whole seasons of orchestral, choral, chamber and opera.  This means that we go to a lot of concerts that include unfamiliar music, not just concerts containing the safe and well-known.  We belong to supporting groups for classical music organisations.  We socialise with audiences, musicians and composers.  I am an amateur composer myself and my first composition is available for downloading.

Although I have no formal tuition in music appreciation, performance or composition, music is a major part of my life and most of my discretionary income is spent on music.

In other words I am a good customer for the providers of music.

What do the public – and our friends and acquaintances – think?

Without the benefit of formal polling, my observations and conversations indicate that:

  • Working composers enjoy contemporary music and are enthusiastic about it.
  • Some musicians are enthusiastic about contemporary music.  I have also talked to musicians – from amateurs through to some of the world’s greatest musicians – who intensely dislike much contemporary music.
  • Audience members who regularly attend concerts – and who provide the money and support for the musicians and composers – reject most contemporary music.  I say “most” because occasionally we hear new pieces that have melody, harmony, orchestration, whatever, and they strike a chord (pardon the pun!) with the audience.

A New Zealand example of “good” contemporary music is an early composition by David Farquhar (1928 – 2007) called Ring Around the Moon Suite.  It is frequently played on Radio New Zealand and every time I hear it I turn up the radio.  Why?  Lovely simple melodies, catchy rhythm.  It is not necessarily a favourite of critics, and even the composer once said it was not a favourite of his.  But it is undemanding, simple music at its best and this is demonstrated by the air time and consumer support it receives.

Coming soon: What do Abba and Mr Beethoven have in common?

Published in: on November 10, 2009 at 1:00 am  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , ,